Santa Fe Trail Ranch POA
BOARD MEETING
February 16, 2002
Sullivan Room, Trinidad State Junior College

Board Members
Present:
Ed Hockett
Michael Hughes
Rick Johnson
Bob Santoro
Mike Shelton
Harriet Vaugeois
Bill Wenstrom
Jerry Whitington
Absent:
Paul Miner
 
Also Present:
Gail Thomas
Guests:
Matt Ciarlo
Mario Ciarlo
Gene Downs
Dennis Malone
Michelle Minion
Frances Purswell-Montoya
Carol Rawle
Vaughan Roundy
Dennis Scott
Mary Jo Shelton
Betty Withington

  1. CALL TO ORDER - President Vaugeois called this regular meeting of the Board to order at 9:00 A.M.
     
  2. PROOF OF NOTICE - Gail Thomas gave proof of notice.
     
  3. INTRODUCTION AND ROLL CALL - The President checked the attendance of Board members and found only one member missing. She, then, recognized guest, Matt Ciarlo, the Ranch's Road Contractor, for the purpose of addressing the Board. Mr. Ciarlo briefly discussed the need to trim trees along the roadways and possible problems this could cause with property owners. The Board indicated the Covenants call for a 15' easement to allow for such trimming. Mr. Ciarlo, also , indicated that he was looking for a piece of equipment called an Ice Breaker. He would only be able to use it on Santa Fe Trail Ranch, but it would help remove ice problems in difficult places on the Ranch. Unfortunately, he has been unable to find one priced reasonably, but will continue to look. Finally, he asked reassurance about the validity of a three-year contract he held with the Ranch that was signed by members from a previous Board no longer in office . The Board promised to place his question on the agenda, and discuss it later in the meeting.
     
  4. DETERMINATION OF QUORUM - Only one member was absent, so a quorum was present.
     
  5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - M. Shelton questioned the figure of $28,000 the Fisher Peak Fire Protection District had set aside for the construction of a sub-station. Gail Thomas assured him the number was correct, but would check and verify the number [The figure was verified by Gail following the meeting]. J. Withington then moved the minutes be accepted as written. The motion passed.
     
  6. APPROVAL OF MONTHLY FINANCIALS - Treasurer, B. Wenstrom, offered the January financial reports for approval. H. Vaugeois questioned what action was being taken on a property more than 90 days overdue. Mr. Wenstrom explained that contact had been lost with that property owner, so currently no action was being taken. It was recommended he send a certified letter with return receipt requested, so action could move forward. R. Johnson then moved that the reports be accepted. The motion passed.
     
  7. OLD BUSINESS
     
    1. Committee Reports:

      Emergency Services: R. Johnson recognized guest, Dennis Scott, for the purpose of presenting the work of the Emergency Services' sub-committee on 911.  Mr. Scott explained the goal of the sub-committee was to ensure a reasonable response to a 911 call especially in the case of a phone hang-up.  Currently in such a situation a name and address will come up, but it is questionable whether the location of the address can be found.  Unfortunately, there is duplication of sub-division names as well as street names within the county.  In addition, the county's address numbering system is highly suspect.  There is a county E911 Board chaired by Mike White, Assistant Fire Chief of the Stonewall District.  Amiee Duran at the County and Quest are other key participants in trying to bring about a working system.  They are attempting to resolve current problems.  Ideally there should be a multiple console system with multiple operators on duty at any time.  The state-of-the-art system would also have consoles in emergency vehicles with GPS directions. Potential impact of the implementation of an effective system could be the renaming of streets, renumbering of addresses, and replacing all maps currently in use.  H. Vaugeois wondered if the Ranch should begin fund-raising efforts to help implement the necessary changes. Mr. Scott responded that the County Commissioners had just heard a first presentation on system implementation which would come at a high cost when the county has no funds budgeted for it.  Consequently, there will be a delay of many months before implementation begins.  Although it may be desirable to correct confusing street names and inappropriate numbering, the use of GPS addresses will probably eliminate the need for large scale change.  At the moment, in order to ensure a proper 911 response it is best to have an escort waiting for the emergency vehicles when they arrive at the main gate of the Ranch.  Meanwhile, the 911 sub-committee will concentrate on having a sub-division name attached to each current address in the 911 computer, and providing directions to these listed subdivisions.  The Board thanked Mr. Scott for his work in this area.

      R. Johnson then continued his report by noting that the lights at the Guard shack are not functioning properly, but repair is being attempted.  Finally, he announced that twelve sets magnetic signs have arrived which can be attached to vehicles to promote Neighborhood Watch.  The signs will be distributed to interested participants after training at the March Emergency Services meeting.  He was encouraged to make sure that the community is well informed about them before their use begins.

      Common Area: It was noted that M. Hughes had just distributed a thorough and highly informative report about work on the roads which will appear shortly on the web site.  He, therefore, opened the floor for questions.  B. Santoro then read a letter written by himself on behalf of several other property owners complaining about the icy conditions on Cottonwood Canyon Drive.  Although some board members indicated their roads were the best they had been, everyone acknowledged there are shady and protected sections on roads all over the Ranch which can be hazardous.  Mr. Hughes reviewed the Ranch's policy on plowing which does not begin until there is an accumulation of at least five inches.  Even so, he had authorized a plowing of troublesome icy spots in January.  Mr. Santoro asserted that the problem may be that several unplowed small snow falls could accumulate into a difficult icy situation.  B. Wenstrom observed that additional money could always be added to Mr. Hughes budget for snow removal, but of course, it would be taken from some other project.  Everyone declined to add additional funds for snow removal.  Instead, everyone spoke of the need to always drive sufficiently carefully for the conditions that exist.  Mr. Hughes accepted Mr. Santoro's letter and will remain alert to the problem.

      Conservancy Contract: H. Vaugeois announced that at 10:00 A.M. on Monday February, 18 the President of Greenlands Reserve would be on the Ranch to tour the conservancy and write the final contract.  It is a boiler plate contract with urban references removed that would allow Greenlands to own, and the POA to manage the conservancy. Ms. Vaugeois questioned the procedure for approval of the contract since the next scheduled Board meeting would be in June.  R. Johnson moved that the final contract be passed around, reviewed by selected Board members, and approved by the President prior to March 1.  If this can not be achieved, it will be brought to the next Board meeting.  The motion passed.

      Communication Committee: H. Vaugeois first collected the long lost sample new property holder handbook which had been passing for review.  She will use the comments to compile a new version to be distributed to local realtors.  She called on E. Hockett to give a progress report on the Board member recognition project which had been approved at the last meeting.  He indicated current thinking was to buy or create a board with name plates for all members of previous Boards.  This large plaque could be put on permanent display at the proposed Fire Department sub-station.  Such a plaque with name plates could be purchased, or constructed possibly by a Ranch craftsman.  He was encouraged to continue the project and to try to locate a craftsman to create a large plaque.  Ms. Vaugeois continued her report citing the excellent improvements that had been made to the look of the web site by Pat Roehl and Kristin Spinning.  She also noted that Mary Jo Shelton had contributed much time and effort to the creation of the ski page.  The construction connection page continues to progress.

      Covenant Committee: B. Santoro reported that the committee had met on Wednesday February 13.  They had identified a focus goal of trying to change the percentage necessary to amend the Covenants.  They had realized that approval of such a change required the permission of the Mortgage holders, also.  This means a list of the mortgage holders must be collected at the Courthouse.  Guest, Carol Rawle, pointed out that this might best be achieved by asking the appropriate office to compile a list over a limited amount of time rather than immediately upon demand.  President Vaugeois instructed the committee to proceed quickly on the task, since it must be complete for other events to take place.  In a related issue, E. Hockett had met with the committee to resolve voting procedures at Ranch elections.  It was determined that the Covenants allow a property owner to vote in person or by proxy.  The proxy may be submitted on paper or electronically.  These are the methods that will be used for voting this year.

      Sub-Committee on Fencing: J. Withington had spoken with Alan Walter who holds the grazing lease on the Ranch.  They discussed the loss of cattle he was experiencing on the Western boundary of the Ranch where there is no fence.  For this reason, Mr. Withington wondered if the Board intended to relieve this problem.  B. Wenstrom estimates that it will take $45,000 to complete the project with the cost being shared by our Western neighbor, Ray Whitmire.  It is possible that a bulldozer could be employed at the rate of $65.00/hour at the same time to clear a fire break along the fence line.  It was determined the first step would be to do the surveying required by Colorado law.  R. Johnson moved that the Board acquire a surveying proposal for fence along the Western boundary that would be brought back to the Board for the June 15 meeting.  The motion passed.

      Budget Committee: Treasurer, B. Wenstrom, had located a hidden reserve of about $20,000 in the Ranch's accounts.  Since it had been located, it needed to be assigned to a category for proper accounting.  Mr. Wenstrom moved to 1) Determine the exact amount of the surplus, 2) Place $9,000 in the budget to offset a potential shortfall caused by the unexpected completion of road work in December which prevented an anticipated carryover of funds, and 3) place the remainder in the Reserve Fund.  In discussion of the motion M. Hughes observed that the Road Committee could always use additional money.  The Board recognized the validity of Mr. Hughes point, but passed the motion as presented.  Next. Mr. Wenstrom distributed a chart he had prepared comparing interest that could be accumulated in accounts at different banks.  The chart showed that $937 of interest could be gained by changing accounts and using 7-day CDs.  The only drawback would be the need to print new checks, but this would have to be done with the current account, also.  Therefore, Mr. Wenstrom moved to switch the Ranch accounts to First National placing some of the funds into seven day CDs.  The motion passed.  Finally, Mr. Wenstrom asked if the Ranch should retain a charge account at Big R which was about to lapse.  It was agreed by mutual consent to keep the account.  The Board commended Mr. Wenstrom on his diligent performance of duty illustrated by his finding an accounting error that had existed for some time.

    2. Legal Representation: B. Wenstrom presented the attached letters (Appendix A) from Dennis Malone, Attorney at Law. He subsequently moved that Mr. Malone be retained as the Board's lawyer of record for routine legal matters. The motion failed. M. Shelton agreed to continue research on this issue. He requested Mr. Wenstrom to provide him with an estimate of how often the Board requires routine legal service. Mr. Shelton will alert the Board should a decision need to be made.
       
    3. Board Goals Update: President Vaugeois asked the Board to consider progress made thus far in achieving the three goals the Board had set for itself at the orientation meeting. It was agreed efforts had been made, but substantial results still needed to be achieved. It was agreed to persist in the efforts.
       
  8. NEW BUSINESS
     
    1. Fire District Letter: President Vaugeois asked that a letter (Appendix B) received from Buddie Curro, Fire Chief of the Fisher Peak Volunteer Fire Department, be read into the official record. Chief Curro stated his objection to the no-outlet signs currently in use on the Ranch. The Board then debated the merits of aesthetics versus safety. R. Johnson finally moved that the Board authorize the use of universally recognized signage as recommended by Chief Curro to designate dead-end roads. The motion passed. B. Wenstrom indicated that there is $10,000 allotted to building, equipment, and signs in the budget. President Vaugeois requested E. Hockett to draft and circulate a Board response to Chief Curro's letter.
       
    2. Future Planning Committee: M. Shelton reported that he had attended a Fisher Peak Fire District Board of Directors meeting. They have set aside money for building a sub-station on the Ranch to cut response time. They are considering a location in Gallinas Canyon. M. Hughes pointed out that that area had flooded in the recent past. He also noted that the J lots on the access road are for sale. Guest, Gene Downs, admitted the location was still flexible since the Conservancy agreement may well prevent construction in the protected area. M. Shelton concluded that a sub-station will be built, and it is in our best interest to assist as much as we can, if we want it on the Ranch.
       
    3. POA Picnic: H. Vaugeois announced that the Women's Group was relinquishing the organization of the summer picnic. It would be continued by a planning group representing all sectors of the Ranch. It will now be held on the Conservancy during the 4th of July weekend and will link together other Ranch events such as a fishing derby and a town meeting.
       
  9. FROM THE FLOOR
     
    1. M. Shelton moved to accept the existing Ciarlo contract mentioned earlier in the meeting as written and signed. The motion passed.
       
    2. Guest, Frances Purswell-Montoya, asked to bring up three matters:
      1. She first requested that the 25 MPH speed limit signs be replaced. The Board discussed the matter, but fell into the same debate that occurred earlier with the dead-end road signs. It was agreed to refer the matter to the Emergency Services and Common Area committees and table the matter for the present.
      2. Ms. Purswell-Montoya expressed her pleasure hearing in B. Santoro's letter the praise for property owners with small snow plows who attempt to improve road conditions with their efforts. She was distressed, though, that during the discussion following the reading of Mr. Santoro's letter there was an implication that the small plows were creating problems. The Board response was that there was no intent to criticize the property owners' efforts. There are, however, dos and don'ts of plowing, and the Road Committee will try to disseminate this information.
      3. Finally, she noted that her road has hazardous muddy spots that she must traverse regularly. Therefore, she wondered if there was any reason individual property owners couldn't buy gravel on their own to eliminate specific road problems they faced. M. Hughes noted that liability could be an issue, and the work could compromise the road development plan. Nevertheless, the Road Committee is not averse to offering advice on how problems may be corrected, and even accepting donations directed to remedy specific problems.
         
    3. Guest, Betty Withington, observed that the Covenants prohibit trailers on lots for long periods of time. Yet, there are many trailers remaining on lots beyond the allowable time. It was noted this is a difficult covenant to enforce. Still, if someone identifies a failure to comply, it should be reported, and letters beginning the enforcement process will start.
       
  10. ADJOURNMENT
    In view of no further business, M. Shelton moved the meeting be adjourned. The motion passed and adjournment took place at 12:47 P.M.

APPENDIX A

Text of Letter from Dennis Michael Malone

January 29, 2002

Mr. Bill Wenstrom
Santa Fe Trail Ranches
33222 Conifer Drive
Trinidad, CO 81082

RE: Representation of Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Association

I am writing to you as a Board member of the Association (the "POA") in response to our phone conversation regarding possible representation of the POA by this office.

In the past I have represented the Board from time to time. I often represent individual lot owners, sometimes concerning disputes between lot owners. Because of the potential for conflict of interest, and so that there is no misunderstanding of my role, I am making the following disclosures to comply with ethical requirements.

ETHICAL DISCLOSURES:

1. Our client would the POA Board acting on behalf of the Association as an entity. By acting in this capacity, we would not be deemed to represent each and every owner of a lot, nor each and every member of the POA. Our allegiance would be solely to the Board who may give directions through their officers or authorized agents.

2. We may be asked to render other advice or legal services to individual lot owners or POA members while representing the Board. Representation of the Board, by itself would not prevent us from representing individual lot owners or members, provided that such representation does not directly involve the Board, the POA as an entity, and does not challenge the Board or the POA's policies, governing documents, or actions. From time to time there be a need to sign a waiver of potential conflict of interest in order to proceed with other legal services, and upon full and proper disclosure, we expect that the Board will do so.

ATTORNEYS FEES:

Hourly fees for Dennis Michael Malone are: $200 per hour for non-litigation services, and $250 for per hour for litigation, whether administrative hearing, arbitration, mediation, or court filed litigation. Time is kept in 12 minute increments and the minimum charge for phone calls is $15. Long distance phone or fax costs, charged by the carrier, are estimated and are not exact. A minimum cost of $1.50 per long distance phone call or fax will be charged in addition to the attorney fee. From time to time we may require the deposit of a retainer to be used to pay costs (not attorneys fees). The cost retainer is kept in our trust account and we account for the money from time to time. We commonly send statements monthly, but may send statements more frequently if the amount of legal services warrants the extra invoicing. Payment is due within 10 days of the date of invoice, unless other arrangements are made.

Rather than charging on an hourly basis, we can perform many services, such as POA assessment collection, on a set fee basis, or a project basis, provided that the process is not contested. The Board should feel free to discuss and suggest alternative fee arrangements.

Please review this letter and discuss its contents with the Board. If the terms are acceptable, or if we agree to changes, I will prepare a form of waiver of conflict of interest for signature by a POA representative. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Dennis M. Malone

DMM/tm


APPENDIX B

FISHER'S PEAK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
109 West Main Street
Trinidad, CO 81082
January 16, 2002

Board of Directors
Santa Fe Trail Ranch
109 West Main Street
Trinidad, CO 81082

Dear Board Members,

At yesterday evening's Fire Department meeting we were reviewing the mapping of the Santa Fe Trail Ranch, Trinidad Lake Ranches and other properties in the District in order to better familiarize our staff with the District, and improve our response time. During the training it was indicated that your Ranch uses a coded symbol for No Outlet signs.

I urge you to eliminate the use of a coded symbol for any purpose. In the case of an emergency on your Ranch, particularly a medical emergency or structural fire where moments may mean the difference between life and death, coded symbols may be overlooked or misunderstood by emergency personnel with potentially tragic results.

Emergency personnel are trained in universally understood directions and symbols such as No Outlet or Dead End. The symbol your Ranch is using is not appropriate and can be considered dangerous.

As Chief of the Fisher's Peak Fire Protection District it is my responsibility to help residents of the District identify possible impediments to safety. Therefore I urge you to correct this matter and provide universal signage to help insure that all emergency personnel will be able to fulfill their duties to provide the best possible emergency response to the residents of the Santa Fe Trail Ranch.

Thank you for your attention to this very critical matter.

Sincerely,

Buddie Curro
Fire Chief


Submitted by Ed Hockett, Secretary, February 21, 2002