-
Budget / Financials - Bill
Wenstrom discussed issues concerning the 2002 budget, in particular, dues
income. It was shown that there were 5 lots excluded from the dues income
for 2001. Pending feedback from the Board, the extra money from the dues
income will be placed in the budget for road surfacing. Bill wanted CBIZ
to work on a system for redoing the way the lot numbering is done in the
CBIZ database. This would be consistent with the numbering done by Santa
Fe Trail Ranches. Tina Woods will check to see if this can be done using
the current software at CBIZ.
-
Emergency Services (See
attached report). In addition to the written report from Rick Johnson, it
was noted that an additional security camera would cost approximately
$700.00. And it was also decided that signage needs to be discussed with
members of the Common Area Committee to avoid duplication of signs and/or
other problems arising from lack of communication.
-
911 Compliance - Jim Davis
discussed this issue noting there has not being any progress from the
County on this issue due to budget considerations. The fact that the 911
facility is in the process of relocating also contributes to the lack of
progress. Through Michael Hughes’ efforts there is a complete breakdown of
the readdressing of the Ranch and the reidentification of some duplicately
named streets in the county and other areas. The County Administrator
accepts the idea for SFTR to do the re-addressing and 911 identification themselves.
-
Communication - (
Click Here to view report).
Carol Rawle summarized the written report for Board. A question was posed
concerning the ability to identify those persons posting items on the
community calendar on the website. It was determined that the Webmaster
has the capability to identify. Jim Davis asked if there were any
statistics regarding the number of “hits” to the website. Bill Wenstrom
stated that Pat Roehl has the ability to acquire stats from the server.
The last time this was done, the website was getting
more than 200
hits per day. However, there are those who come across the
website by accident looking for history related sites. Vaugh Roundy asked
how the information on the website is controlled. Bill Wenstrom said Pat
Roehl scans for inappropriate messages and notifies the Board. All
inappropriate material is removed.
-
Covenant Review - Jim Davis
Stated that although assessments changes to lots, improved or unimproved,
are published the old covenants make reference to that and have not be
updated. He notes that this could be remedied by posting changes or
amendments to the covenants on the website. Rick Johnson talked about
covenant violations and the Board’s lack of notification to owners. Jim
Davis agreed that the policing of covenants has been lax. Some of the
areas for concern include: correct classification of properties, health
concerns, and County ordinances. Rick Johnson suggested that letters go
out to those in violation. Or possibly go through the County for those who
have health issue violations. Carol Rawle asked about the covenants in
relation to stray or loose dogs. Michael Hughes stated that there is no
covenant in relation to dogs. The closest is Article 5.10, which states:
Nuisances. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on
upon any part of the properties nor shall anything be done thereon which
may be, or may become, an annoyance or nuisance to any other owner. Jim
Davis decided the best way to handle the dog problem was to give written
notice to those property owners in violation, and, follow through with
restraining orders if notice from Board goes unheeded. Bill Bumstead
called for a motion to establish a sequence of events for handling
differences between owners which stated: If an issue can not be settled
between property owners and the issue deals with covenant violations, the
parties can then ask the Covenant Committee to mediate. If that does not
solve the issue, the Covenant Committee may take the issue to County
Authorities. Carol Rawle seconded this motion. A vote was taken. 6 (six)
in favor, 2 (two) opposed. Motion passed.
-
Common Area - (See attached
report). Bill Bumstead asked for budget clarifications regarding the
Conservancy Trust Fund. It was found that these monies were already in the
budget. Bill Wenstrom discussed weed control. Weed Control will be focused
on members adopting sections of the road to police for weeds. Also Bill
stated that the use of ATV’s and sprayers would be the effective and
economical way to control weeds. Michael Hughes had no new reports from
the Road Subcommittee. Discussions about fencing were also touched on. It
was suggested by Bill Bumstead that during the next Common Area Committee
meeting members should be appointed to research the fencing issues.
-
Water - (See attached report).
Rick Johnson reported that the last meeting between the Water Committee
and OPEC resulted in OPEC notifying the POA that they are seeking
arbitration as called for in the contract to resolve any remaining
disagreements between the parties. Primarily, these are issues relating to
the acceptable leakage rate and the cost of sanitizing the system. Jim
Davis stated that he hopes these issues can be resolved through mediation
instead of arbitration which would be a less costly process.
-
Updated Reports - No updated
reports at this time.